Black Hole Sun: Life is Weird Sometimes
10 weeks ago, I was flying
back to the US for a mission conference. I was exhausted before I
left, but found myself unable to sleep more than a few minutes at a
time on the 14-hour flight, and tried to pass the time with in-flight movies.
The plane was a 787 "Dreamliner," impressively new with a
well-designed interior and auto-dimming windows. Those windows turned
into a problem when they didn't dim quite enough, and the sun just
happened to rise directly outside my window. I was at first confused
at the alien, blue sun which rose, until I realized the windows had
auto-dimmed and the manual controls were disabled. The best I could
do to avoid this piercing cyan orb, dimmer than it would have been
but still painful to tired eyes, was to shift in my seat and pull my
hat down low. I had already watched a couple of movies and nothing
looked interesting, but an old classic-era movie about Michelangelo
painting the Sistine Chapel caught my eye, partly because it starred
both Rex Harrison and Charlton Heston. (Title: The Agony and the Ecstasy)
I don't remember if I watched Total Recall before or after that one. Either way, Ginger Ale is the best choice on flights, always. |
Growing up on old movies, I
knew both of these men tended to play strong-willed protagonists, and
thought perhaps the two of them theatrically butting heads would be
entertaining in a way that yet another trope-filled recent Hollywood
production would not be. The movie itself was quite unique, beginning
with a long introduction about Michelangelo and his art (which
brought back memories of Francis Schaeffer's old but legit video series – with
his impressively non-ironic goatee and knickerbockers), before moving
into the story of how a warrior pope got a capricious sculptor to
spend years painting a ceiling on his back, and how the perfectionist
artist convinced the tight-fisted pope to keep extending the project
until he was finished.
It occurred to me what a
weird, existential sort of moment this was—flying in thousands of
feet over Alaska, awash in the weird, blue glow of an auto-dimmed
sun, watching an old technicolor period film about Michelangelo and Pope Julius II starring the Professor from My Fair Lady and also Moses/the NRA guy,
while eating Japanese snack mix.
Life is full of these weird,
surreal moments, and they strengthen my faith.
They strengthen it because
recognizing those weird moments is a defense against a subtle but
strong temptation to doubt, which is that believing the Bible explicitly and worshiping the God it describes in 2016 can sometimes feel a little weird, a little unreal.
The Strangeness of Faith (Mirrors the Strangeness of Life)
Maybe you have never felt
this particular temptation, but I often have. "This is the era
of instantaneous global communication, of metamaterials, of Facebook, of
satire-as-news and social upheaval. Isn't bowing over your Chinese
dumplings to thank a 1st Century Jewish Savior-King a
little... weird?"
Let's be honest with ourselves, from the world's perspective, it's quaint at best. It doesn't
always feel weird to us, of course: belief in God can feel entirely natural while
we can see answers to prayer, the testimony of changed lives, those
times we especially feel God's presence, etc. Rationally the evidence
for God is there as well, both historically and logically. So it's right and good that our faith should seem as real and instinctive to us as it often does.
It's obvious, however, that there is much about believing the contents of a canon of books closed almost 2000 years ago and making life decisions based on the will of God, the Creator of our universe that we cannot ever directly observe, that will necessarily seem weird in a culture that calls movies that came out 10 years ago "old," and which struggles to explain even the obvious existence of the human soul or mind. To our modern, cynical world, sincere faith is weird.
It's obvious, however, that there is much about believing the contents of a canon of books closed almost 2000 years ago and making life decisions based on the will of God, the Creator of our universe that we cannot ever directly observe, that will necessarily seem weird in a culture that calls movies that came out 10 years ago "old," and which struggles to explain even the obvious existence of the human soul or mind. To our modern, cynical world, sincere faith is weird.
But—real life is
weird. Even if you've chosen to stay inside a zone of life that has become
comfortable and familiar, there are those really bizarre moments
where you just have to shake your head. For those of us who have left
what was comfortable and familiar, those moments occur much more
frequently.
So when your faith seems
weird, remember that reality is weird too. In some ways, in this modern
era where we live immersed in fiction—TV shows, movies, books,
etc.--we come to expect reality, contrasted to all that fiction,
shouldn't have that weird feeling. But that's a little misguided,
because fiction is usually strange in a way that makes sense to
people, a consistent weird, if you will, because it's coming from the
minds of people. Most fiction is either seeking a balance of
fictional but plausible events, or occurs in an alternate world where
nothing has to conform to our perception of what normal is.
But reality is both real and
yet also stranger than human-devised fiction. Things happen in real
life that no one would find plausible in a novel or movie. One of
those things is that, once, among a people who for hundreds of years
had expected a Messiah from God, a man declared he was that Messiah,
and furthermore the Son of God, and that the proof of this was that
He would be killed, and then be raised back to life again. He was in
fact executed by the colonial government, yet on the third day the
tomb was empty and he was seen alive by hundreds of people, and those
who knew him and wrote about it suggested that if you didn't believe
them, you could ask any of those people. A very falsifiable claim,
then, yet instead of being proved false, its proponents willingly
went to their deaths for the sake of it, and the faith spread across
the entire world. Clearly something happened which cannot be
accounted for by the banal theories of skeptics, and for those of us
who have experienced God in our lives, there is no reason to doubt
the Biblical account, as we have encountered the One of whom it speaks.
Messy Reality vs. Fragile Atheism
So then, for believers in
God, a weird world makes sense.
There are rules by which things are supposed to work, to be sure: the laws of physics are the equations that describe God's order. He called it good, and He doesn't randomly violate them. There are commonsense laws about our world as well. (I love the poem by Rudyard Kipling called "The Gods of the Copybook Headings" which cleverly illustrates how the basic principles of humanity, society, and life don't change, even when we manage to convince ourselves we've finally escaped them.)
There are rules by which things are supposed to work, to be sure: the laws of physics are the equations that describe God's order. He called it good, and He doesn't randomly violate them. There are commonsense laws about our world as well. (I love the poem by Rudyard Kipling called "The Gods of the Copybook Headings" which cleverly illustrates how the basic principles of humanity, society, and life don't change, even when we manage to convince ourselves we've finally escaped them.)
But believers are free to
acknowledge that, at times, weird things happen, which cannot be
explained via the laws which explain how things operate by default,
and we have an exception, what we call a supernatural event. If God
is real, this makes perfect sense: that the One who set up the system
and pronounced it good could still occasionally choose to make
changes here or there as the situation requires, or in answer to the
fervent requests of His people.
Materialists are forced to
either explain away every single inexplicable event by natural means,
or else shrug (Sometimes Christians forget.. under modernism you
were forced to answer, but postmodernism lets you shrug. It's a
nihilistic shrug, though). The only other way out is to deny the
inexplicable thing happened at all, regardless of whatever evidence
exists (as an atheist once said/unconciously admitted to me: Of
course that couldn't be true. If it were, there would have to be a
God) and at other times they simply come up with some other
complicated explanation which they claim is much simpler or less
crazy than "invoking a divine being" as the explanation
(because they have already rejected that explanation for personal
reasons) as if disbelief is the default normal (actually belief in
God is by far the historical norm). It is as if color-blind people
insisted color did not exist, and claimed any other explanation for
people's claims of seeing color was preferable to the crazy, outmoded
idea that things had a magical property they couldn't personally
observe.
But preferring a very
complicated explanation which does not involve God to one that does
involve God is merely a sign that one has made up one's mind
regardless of the evidence. If you don't want to believe in God,
you'll find other explanations more appealing. If you already believe
in God, whether weird things turn out to be less-common application
of natural laws, or something more, it's equally reasonable in both
cases.
In other words, Theists have
much the less fragile position. Atheists tend to rebuff all
challenges to their position with indignation and/or mockery, because
without turning the burden of proof back on the other person, it
becomes apparent just how narrow is the ledge to which they cling.
(Polite atheists certainly do exist, but they typically will not
debate the question either.)
Stranger than Fiction: The Implausibly Real God
In the end, a view of our
world that excludes the strange and inexplicable is insufficiently broad to describe the real world. So when you are tempted to find the truths of scripture,
the concept of God, or any aspects of our faith to be fundamentally
strange (and if you haven't ever thought that, you might have a
different problem...), don't feel bad about it, but recognize that it
is because they are not plausible fiction, but part of messy reality.
If the animals on an alphabet chart were hypothetical, I would consider U's unicorn
to be quite plausible, but E's elephant to be a bizarre fantasy (Tusks
coming out of its face on both sides of a skinny hose-like trunk and
fan-like ears, all stuck on the front of a fat, bulky body? What was
this artist smoking?). Yet the elephant is real and the unicorn is mythical. So there is no
point in insisting that reality conform to what is theoretically
plausible, in fact one of the marks of reality is that it never fits
neatly into its own apparent cliches, and goes in directions we
couldn't have expected if we were allowed to guess first.
We see this in our own walks
of faith: Hypothetical faith is a nice pleasing continuity; real
faith has odd corners and rough patches, even bits that seem missing.
Fictional God is plausible: Allah—a simple, inexorable Unity, or
the million specialized gods of Hinduism, one for everything. The Biblical God is not something we'd have ever imagined: One, but Triune;
internally diverse in a way that defies human description, a Divine
being who starts on the edge of what we can grasp conceptually and
goes far past it. Prophets are more or less plausible—specially
chosen people to communicate the ideas of Heaven to mortal men—but
a suffering Messiah is so implausible that His own disciples didn't see Him
happening under their own noses.
As C.S.Lewis has famously
stated, a real God would be something we couldn't guess, versus
something humans would come up with themselves. Reality is stranger and more wonderful than fiction, and that makes perfect sense in a Christian worldview (because reality is what the mind of God has come up with, whereas fiction is what the minds of humans come up with),
unlike overly simplistic materialist explanations. Christianity is
the one faith that can accommodate rigorous logic and inexplicable
miracles, that doesn't only make claims to mysterious and
inaccessible truth, but actually introduces concepts of reality that
you can grasp at but not succeed in comprehending, that are grounded in the concrete
and not merely mystical hand-waving, yet range far into the mystical realm
in that they exceed our ability to comprehend and have no perfect
analogues in the material world.
All this is exactly as it
should be, and clashes with our expectations yet "rings true"
with reality in exactly the way that real things do. So, rather than
retreating to fictional conceptions that are less mentally tiring,
that seem to make more sense precisely because they were conceived by
humans for human consumption, let's continue to forge ahead into the
weirdness of reality, and of our faith, and be comforted that the
mutual correspondence between the two is simply more evidence that
our faith is indeed real.